Services

High-rigor advisory and implementation support for evidence-heavy work.

The strongest collaborations are those where methodological quality, institutional delivery, and practical implementation all matter.

Advisory & expert services

Three focused ways to engage senior measurement expertise.

Advisory on assessment validity and the EU AI Act, independent expert-witness work, and a research and evaluation partnership for Horizon Europe consortia - each grounded in the design and implementation of 10+ large-scale international studies and 50+ publications, including research papers and policy reports.

EU AI Act & assessment validity

Measurement-validity & EU AI Act advisory

Scientific credibility for the instruments you ship - without hiring a full-time psychometrician.

Ed-tech, HR-tech, assessment, coaching, and well-being companies whose personality, skills, or well-being instruments need a defensible scientific footing, including under the EU AI Act's documented-validity and bias expectations.

Why me

Grounded in the design and cross-cultural validation of the OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills, PISA, and PIAAC, and 50+ publications, including research papers and policy reports on measurement equivalence, DIF, and invariance.

What it delivers

  • A named senior psychometric advisor whose credentials you can cite
  • Instrument and scoring review: item quality, reliability, factor structure, differential item functioning and bias, and measurement invariance across the groups you deploy to
  • Review and sign-off of the validity claims you make about your instruments
  • A standing validity dossier that maps each claim to its evidence
  • Scoping for a full EU AI Act conformity audit when required

Delivered through AdriaMont Consulting.

Discuss an advisory retainer

Expert witness & disputes

Expert witness & independent validation

Independent opinion and testimony on whether selection and assessment tools are valid and fair.

Law firms, employers, and regulators in employment, adverse-impact, and algorithmic-fairness disputes across the EU, UK, and US, and in arbitral and regulatory matters.

Why me

25+ years of research experience designing and validating large-scale assessments (OECD SSES, PISA, PIAAC), with 250,000+ research participants across studies, and 50+ publications, including research papers and policy reports on the measurement-equivalence and DIF methods at the technical core of adverse-impact and algorithmic-discrimination cases.

What it delivers

  • Independent written opinions and expert or rebuttal testimony
  • Analysis of test validity and job-relatedness, adverse impact, and differential item functioning (DIF)
  • Measurement invariance and equivalence across protected groups
  • Assessment of algorithmic fairness in AI-based screening and selection tools
  • Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic comparability of assessments

Engaged independently; a single conflict register means no opinion is given adverse to a company advised on retainer.

Enquire about an instruction

Horizon Europe & consortia

Research partner for Horizon Europe and funded consortia

A senior research, measurement, and evaluation partner for competitive EU and international bids.

Consortium coordinators and lead organisations assembling Horizon Europe and internationally-funded proposals, through AdriaMont Consulting.

Why me

Grounded in senior roles at OECD, UNESCO, Eurofound, and Cedefop and in 20+ programme evaluations and 10+ large-scale international studies. AdriaMont Consulting participates as a work-package partner in Horizon Europe and internationally-funded consortia.

What it delivers

  • Policy research and evidence synthesis
  • Social and emotional skills and competence frameworks
  • Conceptual and measurement framework development
  • Research design and methodology
  • Instrument and questionnaire development
  • Psychometrics: validity, reliability, and measurement invariance
  • Survey design, data analysis, and technical reporting
  • Monitoring, evaluation, and impact assessment
Partner on a consortium

For individual researchers

Pre-Submission Methods Review

The report a hostile methods referee would write about your manuscript, five working days before you submit it.

Individual authors in quantitative social science, measurement and psychometrics, psychology, and education, submitting to an international journal.

Why me

Written and signed by name, under a published ethics statement: never co-authorship, never ghost-writing, no outcome promised, and a permanent recusal from any manuscript reviewed here in every later reviewing capacity, maintained as a register row rather than an intention.

What it delivers

  • A desk-reject screen against the journal you name, read from its own published requirements
  • Every objection a referee will raise, ranked by severity, each with the specific fix or the reasoned defence
  • A statistics and reporting check: estimator fit, assumptions, effect sizes and intervals, reliability, and measurement comparability wherever a claim compares groups
  • A drafted response-to-reviewers skeleton for the objections that are defensible
  • A signed readiness statement, which is explicitly not a prediction of acceptance

Offered by the Center for Psychology, in English, from 550 EUR.

Read the sample report

Also available: the questionnaire pre-screen. Send a draft questionnaire and within 48 hours you have a signed expert review naming the items to revise or cut, the items that resemble a published instrument, and the translation risks to settle before translation starts. Each questionnaire receives an AI first read, followed by a named expert's review. Delivered through AdriaMont Consulting; the order page and sample report are on adriamont.me.

Collaboration

Multiple ways to work together.

Each pairs senior methodological expertise with hands-on delivery, from measurement and evaluation to AI assessment, courses, and platform work.

Measurement and Evaluation Work Packages

EU, UN, foundation, and donor-funded consortia

Theory of change, results frameworks, indicators, instruments, baseline and endline studies, impact analysis, and publication-ready evaluation reports, grounded in 20+ MGIEP evaluation studies and Minderoo FRF impact-measurement work.

Discuss this

Psychometric Instrument Design

Research teams, platforms, education systems, and assessment programs

Construct definition, item banks, scoring, reliability, validity, measurement invariance, DIF, norming, and technical reporting.

Discuss this

Policy Research and Evidence Synthesis

International organizations and policy institutions

Research design, statistical analysis, survey interpretation, policy briefs, reports, and evidence narratives for high-stakes decisions.

Discuss this

AI Assessment Product Strategy

Assessment, education, HR, and well-being product teams

AI feedback architecture, psychometric safeguards, privacy-conscious reporting, prompt QA, and responsible automation of assessment workflows.

Discuss this

Courses and Technical Training

Researchers, analysts, universities, and professional teams

Applied workshops, expert-led professional programs, lab packs, and self-paced learning products developed under the AdriaMont Institute label.

Discuss this

Proposal and Consortium Support

Consortium coordinators and specialist partners

Technical approach design, work package writing, capability statements, evidence models, staffing plans, and proposal-quality review.

Discuss this

AI Startup and Co-Founder Collaboration

Founders, technical teams, and venture builders in assessment, education, HR, and well-being

Co-founder, scientific lead, validation partner, or product-strategy roles for AI-enabled ventures where psychological measurement quality is central.

Discuss this

Platform Investment

Strategic partners, investors, and institutional collaborators

Investment and partnership in companies and platforms where capital, distribution, or institutional access can accelerate validated products.

Discuss this